|
|
Ecosystem
harmony between human and non-human parts of our world
|
|
| Sustainability
Now! |
 |
FOR
THE BIOREGION and Beyond
|
|
|
"Call for emergence
of a human sustainable lifestyle is not out of guilt, shame,
judgment, or sacrifice – it's about a strategic, enlightened,
reduction in use of resources, and a corresponding, deliberate
increase in efficiency, quality, equity, stewardship, trust,
and teamwork."
(David Wann)
|
e-mail
this site to a friend
|
|
|
The
diversity of theoretical ideas and applications that
point to the need for sustainable development is driven
by a list of basic truths about how our world functions.
The statement of a truth represents a reality in our
world, a fact that is supported by scientific certainty,
irrespective of whether its origin is natural, social,
or economic science. How do we best use these truths
to advance the concept of sustainability discussions
where people represent different special interest groups
or possess different experiences?
The
human brain possess pathways that can operate
in a manner to inhibit logical faculties
when a topic
of discussion is contentious, where persons have
different pre-conceived opinions or the discussion
subject goes against one’s belief system. If
this is the case then when the average person is
presented with information for example about climate
change, water shortages, natural resource declines,
affects of population on global stability, pollution,
energy problems, etc., there is ample reason to assume
that active inhibition of a person’s logic
can be caused by heavily invested opinions, emotions,
and belief systems. As much as anything else this
can arise from a feeling of self-preservation (avoiding
hysteria) implying that these issues are somebody
else’s problem, not mine.
The
possibility that human logic can be affected
in this way does not bode well for sustainability
advocates to convince the populace at large that
our global situation has problems. Therefore it
is important that we go back to the fundamental,
non-refutable
basis of why there is a sustainability crisis in
today’s world. The many examples of stressed
natural resources and unstable human societies, in
and of themselves, are viewed by many as doomsday
paranoia that is unfounded because of ideologies
or myths that are perceived as unsupported facts.
To overcome this distorted view our conversation
on sustainability has to be in touch with the basic
truths that affect the foundation for a sustainable
future – those facts that pull us back to the
roots of the problem. After all, facts you can cling
to – emotions just float away.
It is important the public at-large recognize these
facts as irrefutable truths supported by our understanding
of social, economic, and biophysical science. And
these basic truths must be presented in a calm, peaceful,
and emphatic way so that logic can prevail over pre-conceived
opinions and emotional belief systems that are mostly
false, but easier to live with. The fundamental truths
that support the need for achievement of sustainability
include the following (for further details on these
truths go to the Sustainability
Manifesto).
- Everything
material on Earth has limitations
- Many
components of our global system are interconnected
- Change
is the norm, not the exception
- All
socio-economic factors are grounded in
a healthy environment
imperative
[directionality]
- Diversity
within systems [natural or human] will
contribute to
the system’s
stability and resiliency
- Equity
is the foundation of healthy functioning
socio-economic
systems
- Uncertainty
and ignorance are often associated with
complex systems
The above fundamental (basic) truths that promote
the need for considering sustainability must become
a part of normal public conversation in an effort
to develop global solidarity in support of sustainable
development. Ignoring these realities in our world
are the reasons sustainability has become a global
concern. By promoting the discussion of these general
areas of strong scientific consensus we can influence
constituencies with vastly different viewpoints to
focus upon facts they can commonly agree to because
these truths are irrefutable according to scientific
understanding for the way nature and society function.
Using these areas of strong consensus as a starting
point, it becomes much easier to have a dialogue
about problems related to environmental and socio-economic
responsibility, using these basic truths for guidance,
especially when the true concerns of society are
often messy and cross the traditional boundaries
of economic, social, and environmental interests.
|
|
|
|
|
2105
Main Street, Napa, CA 94559 USA
---- Phone: (707) 251-1609 ---- e-mail: rwflint@Sustainability-Now.org
|
Copyright © 2005
- 2010 Sustainability Now! - All Rights
Reserved
2105 Main Street, Napa, CA 94559
Terms of Use & Privacy Statement |
Last
Update: 9/1/10
Web Author: Dr. R. Warren Flint
|
|
|
|