Ecosystem harmony between human and non-human parts of our world
Sustainability Now!

FOR THE BIOREGION and Beyond

for a Better Future

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

"Call for emergence of a human sustainable lifestyle is not out of guilt, shame, judgment, or sacrifice – it's about a strategic, enlightened, reduction in use of resources, and a corresponding, deliberate increase in efficiency, quality, equity, stewardship, trust, and teamwork."
(David Wann)



e-mail this site to a friend


 

 

 

Irrefutable Truths

The diversity of theoretical ideas and applications that point to the need for sustainable development is driven by a list of basic truths about how our world functions. The statement of a truth represents a reality in our world, a fact that is supported by scientific certainty, irrespective of whether its origin is natural, social, or economic science. How do we best use these truths to advance the concept of sustainability discussions where people represent different special interest groups or possess different experiences?

The human brain possess pathways that can operate in a manner to inhibit logical faculties when a topic of discussion is contentious, where persons have different pre-conceived opinions or the discussion subject goes against one’s belief system. If this is the case then when the average person is presented with information for example about climate change, water shortages, natural resource declines, affects of population on global stability, pollution, energy problems, etc., there is ample reason to assume that active inhibition of a person’s logic can be caused by heavily invested opinions, emotions, and belief systems. As much as anything else this can arise from a feeling of self-preservation (avoiding hysteria) implying that these issues are somebody else’s problem, not mine.

The possibility that human logic can be affected in this way does not bode well for sustainability advocates to convince the populace at large that our global situation has problems. Therefore it is important that we go back to the fundamental, non-refutable basis of why there is a sustainability crisis in today’s world. The many examples of stressed natural resources and unstable human societies, in and of themselves, are viewed by many as doomsday paranoia that is unfounded because of ideologies or myths that are perceived as unsupported facts. To overcome this distorted view our conversation on sustainability has to be in touch with the basic truths that affect the foundation for a sustainable future – those facts that pull us back to the roots of the problem. After all, facts you can cling to – emotions just float away.

It is important the public at-large recognize these facts as irrefutable truths supported by our understanding of social, economic, and biophysical science. And these basic truths must be presented in a calm, peaceful, and emphatic way so that logic can prevail over pre-conceived opinions and emotional belief systems that are mostly false, but easier to live with. The fundamental truths that support the need for achievement of sustainability include the following (for further details on these truths go to the Sustainability Manifesto).

  • Everything material on Earth has limitations
  • Many components of our global system are interconnected
  • Change is the norm, not the exception
  • All socio-economic factors are grounded in a healthy environment imperative [directionality]
  • Diversity within systems [natural or human] will contribute to the system’s stability and resiliency
  • Equity is the foundation of healthy functioning socio-economic systems
  • Uncertainty and ignorance are often associated with complex systems

The above fundamental (basic) truths that promote the need for considering sustainability must become a part of normal public conversation in an effort to develop global solidarity in support of sustainable development. Ignoring these realities in our world are the reasons sustainability has become a global concern. By promoting the discussion of these general areas of strong scientific consensus we can influence constituencies with vastly different viewpoints to focus upon facts they can commonly agree to because these truths are irrefutable according to scientific understanding for the way nature and society function. Using these areas of strong consensus as a starting point, it becomes much easier to have a dialogue about problems related to environmental and socio-economic responsibility, using these basic truths for guidance, especially when the true concerns of society are often messy and cross the traditional boundaries of economic, social, and environmental interests.


2105 Main Street, Napa, CA 94559 USA ---- Phone: (707) 251-1609 ---- e-mail: rwflint@Sustainability-Now.org
Copyright © 2005 - 2010 Sustainability Now! - All Rights Reserved
2105 Main Street, Napa, CA 94559
Terms of Use & Privacy Statement
Last Update: 9/1/10
Web Author: Dr. R. Warren Flint